Based on Koranic Verses, Interpretations, and Traditions, Muslim Clerics State: The Jews Are the Descendants of Apes, Pigs, And Other Animals (11/01/02)
By Aluma Solnick at The Middle East Media Research Institute
“Depicting Jews – and sometimes also Zionists – as ‘the descendants of apes and pigs’ is extremely widespread today in public discourse in the Arab and Islamic worlds. For example, in a weekly sermon in April 2002, Al-Azhar Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, the highest-ranking cleric in the Sunni Muslim world, called the Jews ‘the enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs.’ In one of his sermons, Saudi sheikh Abd Al-Rahman Al-Sudayyis, imam and preacher at the Al-Haraam mosque – the most important mosque in Mecca – beseeched Allah to annihilate the Jews. He also urged the Arabs to give up peace initiatives with them because they are ‘the scum of the human race, the rats of the world, the violators of pacts and agreements, the murderers of the prophets, and the offspring of apes and pigs.’”

Pigs, Jews & War: Fronts in the clash of civilizations. (11/01/02)
By Jonah Goldberg at The National Review Online
“Jean Francois Revel wrote, ‘Clearly, a civilization that feels guilty for everything it is and does will lack the energy and conviction to defend itself.’ Well, increasingly I can’t help but think that the liberals of Europe and the leftists of America (there’s still hope for our liberals) have lost the energy and the conviction to defend themselves. They cannot grasp that our enemies — especially those hailing from the Third World — cannot be reasoned with. It doesn’t matter if we wronged them in the past. It doesn’t matter if their historical grievances have weight. What matters, as a matter of pure survival and morality, is what they believe today and what they do because of those beliefs. Germany had any number of legitimate grievances about the Treaty of Versailles and its treatment at the hands of the victors in World War I. That doesn’t justify Nazism.”

The Faith-Based Left: Getting behind the debate. (02/05/01)
By Stanley Kurtz at National Review Online
“Conservatives and liberals alike have bought into the notion that we face a choice between value-free programs that ignore the individual and simply dole out material goods, and faith-based programs that look to transform character by instilling morality. Certainly there are food banks and soup kitchens that fit the model of a strictly secular giveaway that makes neither moral nor behavioral demands on its beneficiaries. (Ironically, many of these effectively secular programs are run by churches.) But the government already gives legal and financial support to a raft of coercive and morally fraught leftist social programs that are religious in all but name. These programs are designed to turn their beneficiaries into gender warriors and militant multi-culturalists — whether they like it or not.”

The Church of the Left: Finding meaning in liberalism. (05/31/01)
By Stanley Kurtz at National Review Online
“Liberalism arose as a solution to the destructive religious wars of Europe’s past, and succeeded because it allowed people of differing religious perspectives to live peacefully and productively in the same society. Designed to make the world safe for adherents of differing faiths, liberalism itself was never supposed to be a faith. But that is exactly what liberalism has become. And this transformation of liberalism into a de facto religion explains a lot about what we call ‘political correctness.’”

Our Secularist Democratic Party (Fall 2002)
By Louis Bolce and Gerald De Maio in The Public Interest
“Anyone who has followed American politics over the past decade cannot help but feel some concern about the supposed fundamentalist Christian threat to democratic civility, pluralism, and tolerance. At the very least, the attentive citizen would find it hard not to regard the cultural and political positions of fundamentalists as outside the mainstream, given the volume of media stories that have conveyed this point. At the same time, the media’s obsession with politicized fundamentalism distracts public attention from the changing role of religion in political life today. In particular, the media overlooks the remarkable erosion of denominational boundaries that until a quarter century ago defined the religious dimension of partisan conflict, with Catholics, Jews, and southern evangelicals aligned with the Democratic party and nonsouthern white, mostly mainline Protestants forming the religious base of the Republicans. Also, the media mistakenly frames cultural conflict since the 1970s as entirely the result of fundamentalist revanchism. In so doing, the media ignores the growing influence of secularists in the Democratic party and obfuscates how their worldview is just as powerful a determinant of social attitudes and voting behavior as is a religiously traditionalist outlook.”

UW-Waukesha astir over column: Student writer links black fashion, community, parents to Young’s death (10/25/02)
By Scott Williams in The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
“The fatal mob beating of Charlie Young Jr. is stirring racial tensions on a college campus here after a student newspaper column linked the Milwaukee incident to lifestyles and struggles in the African-American community. ‘Stop the welfare payments and you’ll end the madness,’ wrote assistant editor Dan Hubert in the latest issue of the Observer, University of Wisconsin-Waukesha’s student newspaper. Since the column rolled off the presses earlier this week, angry students have demanded Hubert’s expulsion from school and called for the university to cut off funding for the Observer.”

Student columnist apologizes but defends stance at forum: UW-Waukesha crowd sounds off about bigotry, rights (10/30/02)
By Scott Williams in The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
“Attracting more than 200 students and others to the University of Wisconsin-Waukesha, the nearly two-hour forum was organized in response to a student newspaper column that linked African-American culture to a deadly mob attack in Milwaukee. The uproar that followed has turned an uneasy spotlight on the Waukesha college, as students and administrators struggle to balance freedom of the press with racially charged commentary that some view as hate speech.”

Zigging and zagging on the sniper’s trail (10/21/02)
By Mark Steyn in The National Post
“When the expert commentators get so much of the easily verifiable stuff wrong, it’s hard to see why their airier fancies should command respect. Is the sniper linked to al-Qaeda? ‘Most unlikely,’ said Elliott Leyton, a St. John’s professor of anthropology, in The Globe And Mail. ‘Such groups (religious or political) generally find their murderous pleasures in bombs, airplanes and gas, not rifles.’ In fairness to the Islamofascists, when it comes to their ‘murderous pleasures’ variety is the spice of death. They disdain a consistent M.O. Much of what they do is unprecedented: September 11th, the shoe bomber, the Afghan resistance leader they assassinated by posing as interviewers and killing him with a disguised camera. Before I rule out the Islamists, I’d want a better reason than Professor Leyton’s.”

We angry white males were right about the sniper (10/27/02)
By Mark Steyn in The London Telegraph
“You get the picture: sure, Muslim fundamentalists can be pretty extreme, but what about all our Christian fundamentalists? Unfortunately, for the old moral equivalence to hold up, the Christians really need to get off their fundamentalist butts and start killing more people. At the moment, the brilliantly versatile Muslim fundamentalists are gunning down Maryland schoolkids and bus drivers, hijacking Moscow theatres, self-detonating in Israeli pizza parlours, blowing up French oil tankers in Yemen, and slaughtering nightclubbers in Bali, while Christian fundamentalists are, er, sounding extremely strident in their calls for the return of prayer in school.”

Coloring the sniper news (10/11/02)
By Michelle Malkin in Jewish World Review
“The media immediately embraced the Angry White Male theory by sensationalizing the cops’ questioning over the weekend of one Robert Gene Baker. Newspaper reports described him as ‘heavily tattooed’ and ‘linked’ to ‘militia and white supremacist’ groups. The headlines screamed: ‘Supremacist Sought in Sniping Spree’ and ‘Neo Nazi Named as Sniper Murders Suspect.’ But in fact, Baker was never a suspect and had no weapons on him at the time he was taken into custody for an outstanding auto-theft warrant. The AWM theory remains a plausible one, of course. But it isn’t the only one. You won’t hear Katie Couric or Peter Jennings talking about it with their conventional-thinking experts, but there is a significant possibility that the sniper and the sniper’s support system could be non-white Muslim extremists with ties to Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda network.”

Who let Lee Malvo loose? (10/25/02)
By Michelle Malkin at TownHall
“The mainstream media informed us this week that Lee Malvo, the reportedly ‘17-year-old’ youth charged as a material witness in the sniper investigation along with John Mohammed, is a ‘Jamaican national.’ As of this writing (Oct. 24), the Immigration and Naturalization Service refused to comment publicly on the exact nature of Malvo’s immigration status. Here are the facts the INS doesn’t want you to know: Lee Malvo is an illegal alien from Jamaica who jumped ship in Miami in June 2001. He was apprehended by the Border Patrol in Bellingham, Wash., in December 2001, but was then let go by the INS district in Seattle in clear violation of federal law and contrary to what the arresting Border Patrol officers intended, according to my law enforcement sources. ”

With the Sniper, TV Profilers Missed Their Mark (10/25/02)
By Paul Farhi and Linton Weeks in The Washington Post
“Almost everything the sniper ‘profilers’ and pundits told the media over the past three weeks turns out to have been off the mark, considering the very real profiles of the two people arrested early yesterday. The men and women who had been described on the air and in print as ‘forensic psychologists’ and ‘former FBI investigators’ took many swings at the who and why of the sniper case — and mostly missed.... The important question is, was the orgy of speculation harmless — or was there a very dangerous undercurrent to it? By saturating the public’s consciousness with phantom images of thirtyish white men, did the media profilers distract attention from a more general and possibly open-minded search for the perpetrators?”

Arm-Twisting: A historian’s book makes the case for gun control. Other scholars hotly dispute his claims. (04/05/01)
By Kimberley A. Strassel at OpinionJournal
“Released by highbrow publisher Knopf last year, Arming America was a historical and political bombshell, a rare piece of work that purported not only to overturn long-held historical beliefs, but to alter modern politics profoundly in the process. Few colonial Americans owned guns, Mr. Bellesiles argues. He bases this on his study of probate and military records, travel narratives and other primary sources.... Unsurprisingly, left-leaning journalists, academics and politicians went weak at the knees.... But there’s a problem. A growing number of respected scholars, from across the political spectrum, are saying that Mr. Bellesiles’s research and conclusions are wrong.”

Guns and Poses: Michael Bellesiles’s work is charming and disarming — but sloppy and maybe fraudulent. (02/22/02)
By Kimberley A. Strassel at OpinionJournal
“Arming America came out in September 2000. About that time, James Lindgren, a professor of law at Northwestern, wanted to reanalyze Mr. Bellesiles’s probate information for his own research. He sent Mr. Bellesiles a routine e-mail in August 2000 asking the Emory historian for details about which records he had used and where to find them. Mr. Bellesiles wrote back that he’d read them on microfilm in the federal archives in East Point, Ga. But when Mr. Lindgren and others made calls, they were told the facility had no such records. Mr. Bellesiles then sent an e-mail saying he’d read them in some 30 different places across the country. He also told Mr. Lindgren he couldn’t immediately send detailed information on which records he’d used because his counts — made on legal pads — had been damaged by a flood.”

Academic Accountability: An antigun scholar defends his shoddy work by calling critics names. (06/06/02)
By Kimberley A. Strassel at OpinionJournal
“Several weeks ago, in a bold and impressive move, the NEH became the first institution to treat the accusations against Mr. Bellesiles with the gravity they deserve. It came in response to a $30,000 NEH-funded fellowship that the Newberry Library, a Chicago research institution, awarded Mr. Bellesiles in February 2001. Last month NEH deputy chairman Lynne Munson wrote to the library that in light of the ‘serious question concerning academic integrity,’ that have been raised about Mr. Bellesiles, the NEH wanted its name removed from the fellowship. The Newberry Library’s defense is that the criticism of Mr. Bellesiles’s book didn’t take on a ‘scholarly character’ until after it had granted the fellowship. But whatever the timing, the fact remains that Newberry never did anything about revoking or suspending the fellowship — even when serious questions about Mr. Bellesiles’s academic integrity came to the fore.”

Michael Bellesiles Resigns from Emory Faculty (10/25/02)
By Robert A. Paul in a Press Release from Emory University
“I have accepted the resignation of Michael Bellesiles from his position as Professor of History at Emory University, effective December 31, 2002. Although we would not normally release any of the materials connected with a case involving the investigation of faculty misconduct in research, in light of the intense scholarly interest in the matter I have decided, with the assent of Professor Bellesiles as well as of the members of the Investigative Committee, to make public the report of the Investigative Committee appointed by me to evaluate the allegations made against Professor Bellesiles (none of the supporting documents, however, are being made public).”

Voices in the Wilderness: Versus the age-old sirens of appeasement. (10/18/02)
By Victor Davis Hanson at The National Review Online
“Every day a Marine is killed, a French tanker blown up, Christians butchered in Pakistan, tourists incinerated in Bali, terrorist cells broken up from Oregon to New York — and our pundits demand proof that we are at war. Why do the presidents’ critics press their attacks, the more principled playing down the chances of future danger, the more disingenuous engaging in character assassination and cheap psychoanalysis? In a word, human nature. It is our way always to put aside distant threats of the future to enjoy the tangible, but temporary, lull of the present.”

False Alarm: Why Liberals Should Support the War (10/10/02)
By Jonathan Chait at The New Republic Online
“It is perhaps telling that the case for war with Iraq was most clearly made not by Republican President George W. Bush but by Democratic President Bill Clinton. ‘Predators of the twenty-first century,’ Clinton warned, speaking four and a half years ago, ‘will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them.... There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.’ And if the world were to allow Saddam to continue to construct his terrible weapons? ‘Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will,’ Clinton declared. ‘He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you, he’ll use the arsenal.’”

Air War: How Saddam Manipulates the U.S. Media (10/17/02)
By Franklin Foer at The New Republic Online
“Like their Soviet-bloc predecessors, the Iraqis have become masters of the Orwellian pantomime — the state-orchestrated anti-American rally, the state-led tours of alleged chemical weapons sites that turn out to be baby milk factories — that promotes their distorted reality. And the Iraqi regime has found an audience for these displays in an unlikely place: the U.S. media. It’s not because American reporters have an ideological sympathy for Saddam Hussein; broadcasting his propaganda is simply the only way they can continue to work in Iraq. ‘There’s a quid pro quo for being there,’ says Peter Arnett, who worked the Iraq beat for CNN for a decade. ‘You go in and they control what you do.... So you have no option other than to report the opinion of the government of Iraq.’ In other words, the Western media’s presence in the Ministry of Information describes more than just a physical reality.”

Say “No” to War on Iraq (10/17/02)
By Josh Feit in The Stranger
“There’s a much more logical and honest (and urgent) way to proceed against terrorism. Let’s promote democratic reforms in the real linchpins of the region: Egypt, Israel, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, and Iran. And I’m not talking about Radio Free Europe broadcasts — an imprecise, hit or miss Cold War tactic waged against our enemies. I’m talking about a direct American campaign for democracy (and women’s rights!) in the Middle East aimed at our suspect allies. In short, we have more than radio waves to influence the likes of Cairo and Riyadh. We’ve got dollars, business investments, and political relationships. Let’s get tough, and demand changes from our friends; demands backed with the threat of pulling our support.”

Say “Yes” to War on Iraq (10/17/02)
By Dan Savage in The Stranger
“You see, lefties, there are times when saying ‘no’ to war means saying ‘yes’ to oppression. Don’t believe me? Go ask a Czech or a European Jew about the British and French saying ‘no’ to war with Germany in 1938. War may be bad for children and other living things, but there are times when peace is worse for children and other living things, and this is one of those times. Saying no to war in Iraq means saying yes to the continued oppression of the Iraqi people. It amazes me when I hear lefties argue that we should assassinate Saddam in order to avoid war. If Saddam is assassinated, he will be replaced by another Baathist dictator — and what then for the people of Iraq? More ‘peace’ — i.e., more oppression, more executions, more gassings, more terror, more fear.”

They want to kill us all (10/19/02)
By Mark Steyn in The Spectator
“An appeaser, said Churchill, feeds the crocodile in the hope that it will eat him last. But sometimes the croc eats him first anyway. For months, the US, Britain and Canada had warned the Indonesian government about terrorists operating within its borders. So had Singapore and Malaysia. President Megawati’s administration responded by calling Washington anti-Muslim. The American ambassador was publicly denounced by her vice-president. Hassan Wirayuda, the foreign minister, said in February that the outside world’s fears of Islamic terrorism in Indonesia were overblown and that in Jakarta ‘we laugh at it’. Ha-ha. From government contacts to police indifference, the administration’s strategy was to deny the crocodile existed and then quietly slip him the à la carte menu. Now, Indonesian stocks are down, the rupiah’s in the toilet, the national carrier’s flying empty, and the official tourism websites have switched to continuously updated info on dead tourists, safe in the knowledge that they’re unlikely to be getting any new bookings from live ones.”

Don’t blame the west (10/16/02)
By Clive James in The Guardian
“But let us allow, for the moment, that the mass outcry against American hegemony is the voice of the true, the eternal and the compassionate left. Allowing that, we can put the best possible construction on its pervasiveness. Not just the majority of the intellectuals, academics and schoolteachers, but most of the face-workers in the media, share the view that international terrorism is to be explained by the vices of the liberal democracies. Or, at any rate, they shared it until a few days ago. It will be interesting, in the shattering light of an explosive event, to see if that easy view continues now to be quite so widespread, and how much room is made for the more awkward view that the true instigation for terrorism might not be the vices of the liberal democracies, but their virtues.”

So Long, Fellow Travelers: Is That All That’s Left? (10/20/02)
By Christopher Hitchens in The Washington Post
“As someone who has done a good deal of marching and public speaking about Vietnam, Chile, South Africa, Palestine and East Timor in his time (and would do it all again), I can only hint at how much I despise a Left that thinks of Osama bin Laden as a slightly misguided anti-imperialist. (He actually says he wants to restore the old imperial caliphate and has condemned the Australian-led international rescue of East Timor as a Christian plot against Muslim Indonesia). Or a Left that can think of Milosevic and Saddam as victims.”

Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter wins Nobel Peace Prize (10/11/02)
In The San Francisco Chronicle by Doug Mellgren of The Associated Press
“Former President Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday ‘for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights.’ .... ‘It should be interpreted as a criticism of the line that the current administration has taken,’ Gunnar Berge, chairman of the Nobel committee, said. ‘It’s a kick in the leg to all that follow the same line as the United States.’”

There He Goes Again: Jimmy Carter, our “model ex-president.” (05/02/02)
By Jay Nordlinger in The National Review
“Carter is immensely proud of his rendezvous with Middle East history, and he trades on it constantly. No one should assume, however, that he’s an honest broker — at least anymore. For the past many years, he has been passionately anti-Israel, more or less embracing the PLO line. He has repeatedly been at the service of Yasser Arafat. After the Gulf War, the PLO chief was on the outs with Saudi Arabia, because he had backed Saddam Hussein. So he asked Carter to fly to Riyadh to smooth things over and restore Saudi funding to him — which he did. Arabs are also robust funders of the Carter Center, the ex-president’s redoubt and vehicle in Atlanta.”

Carterpalooza! Jimmy Carter, our “model ex-president.” (10/11/02)
By Jay Nordlinger in The National Review
“The ex-president is known as Joe Human Rights, but he’s mighty selective about whose human rights to champion. If you live in Marcos’s Philippines, Pinochet’s Chile, or apartheid South Africa, he’s liable to care about you. If you live in Communist China, Communist Cuba, Communist Ethiopia, Communist Nicaragua, Communist North Korea, Communist...: screw you.”

Harry Belafonte Slams Colin Powell as Race Sellout (10/08/02)
At The Drudge Report by Matt Drudge
“Singer Harry Belafonte took to the AM radiowaves on Tuesday morning to slam Secretary of State Colin Powell as a sellout to the black race! Belafonte, appearing on San Diego’s 760 KFMB, told host Ted Leitner that Powell was like a plantation slave who moves into the slave owner’s house and only says what his master wants him to say.”

Harry Belafonte’s Havana Farewell (07/18/00)
By Ronald Radosh at FrontPage Magazine
“Most American admirers of Harry Belafonte probably don’t realize that the popular singer and actor is an unreconstructed Stalinist.... In an interview he gave in 1995, Belafonte claimed that ‘racism has sucked up my entire life,’ and that as a result, he decided never to accept ‘an indignity where I might find one.’ Some might view genuflecting before Castro in the year 2000 as an ultimate indignity — but to Harry Belafonte, the illusion dies hard. What will be left, I wonder, when the Cuban people finally are free of the longest surviving dictator in the world and his grotesque socialist prison? The banana boat is coming, Harry, and it won’t be long.”

C.I.A. Letter to Senate on Baghdad’s Intentions (10/07/02)
In The New York Times
“¶Since Operation Enduring Freedom, we have solid evidence of the presence in Iraq of Al Qaeda members, including some that have been in Baghdad. ¶We have credible reporting that Al Qaeda leaders sought contacts in Iraq who could help them acquire W.M.D. capabilities. The reporting also stated that Iraq has provided training to Al Qaeda members in the areas of poisons and gases and making conventional bombs. ¶Iraq’s increasing support to extremist Palestinians coupled with growing indications of relationship with Al Qaeda. suggest that Baghdad’s links to terrorists will increase, even absent U.S. military action.”

Who’s killing the children of Iraq? (10/08/02)
By Margaret Wente in The Globe and Mail
“Of all the reasons to oppose a war against Iraq, one of the most compelling is the image of innocent civilian victims. Children will die — if only because Saddam Hussein won’t hesitate to build orphanages atop his weapons labs. And of all the accusations hurled against the West in its treatment of Iraq, the most damning is the human cost of sanctions. According to many peace groups, humanitarian organizations and politicians, sanctions have killed 500,000 Iraqi children. The total death toll from sanctions amounts to a million and a half innocent people. Are these figures credible? Only if you believe Saddam Hussein.”

Text: Iraq Resolution (10/10/02)
In The Washington Times by The Associated Press
“The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to – (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq. ”

A just war? (10/06/02)
By Jean Bethke Elshtain in The Boston Globe
“Several weeks ago, 100 teachers of Christian ethics, both pacifists and those working within the just war tradition, signed a petition declaring, in its entirety: ‘As Christian ethicists, we share a common moral presumption against a pre-emptive war on Iraq by the United States.’ Although I am an ethicist and a Christian, I was not among the signatories, for two reasons. First, the statement is vague and, therefore, evasive. Within the just war tradition, there is a common moral presumption for justice as well as a recognition that all war is terrible. But there are times when justice demands the use of force as a response to violence, hatred, and injustice.”

Kids beat man to brain death, police say: Nearly 20 suspected of taking part, one just 10 years old (10/01/02)
In The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel by Leah Thorsen
“A mob of nearly 20 kids beat a man brain dead Sunday night after he confronted them for throwing an egg at him and punched one teen in the mouth, police said. Eight suspects, at least one as young as 10, were in custody Tuesday, police said. The victim, Charlie Young Jr., 36, remained on life support. Police said the group chased Young onto the porch of a house at 2021 N. 21st Lane and used bats, shovels and boards to pummel him in an attack that left blood splattered floor to ceiling.”

Community reacts with disbelief, outrage: Police, politicians, neighborhood groups condemn beating (10/01/02)
In The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel by Leonard Sykes Jr.
“As police continued their investigation Tuesday into the mob beating that left Charlie Young Jr. dead, reaction throughout the city ranged from shock and disbelief to outrage. From community centers, schools and City Hall, police, politicians and neighborhood groups condemned the brutal beating as they wrestled with what — if anything — can be done to prevent similar incidents in the future.”

Victim’s response to egging prompted beating, boys say: Youths tell police they were angry at Young’s overreaction (10/02/02)
In The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel by Jamaal Abdul-Alim
“Based on detailed statements police say some of the boys gave, none of the boys had any problem with Young, 36, and they were hanging out with him at a house on W. Brown St. for at least part of Sunday evening. But around 10 p.m., one of them — a 13-year-old nicknamed ‘Bump’ — objected to how Young intruded on a game of insults between Bump and his girlfriend and ‘started ribbing on everybody.’ That’s when Bump threw an egg that might as well have been a bombshell.”

10 held in beating death: Only one is adult; more suspects sought; murder charges expected (10/02/02)
In The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel by Jamaal Abdul-Alim and Jessica McBride
“Among those prosecutors expect to charge with murder in adult court is a 10-year-old boy, who could be the youngest person ever prosecuted as an adult in Wisconsin. Milwaukee Police Chief Arthur Jones said eight of those in custody have confessed to their roles in the beating death of Charlie Young Jr., who died Tuesday evening at Wauwatosa's Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital after being attacked Sunday by about 20 boys and young men.”

7 boys charged as adults in beating: 10-year-old kept in Children’s Court; other juveniles expected to be charged (10/02/02)
In The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel by Jessica McBride, Jamaal Abdul-Alim, and Tom Held
“Prosecutors charged seven youths as adults with first-degree reckless homicide Thursday in a savage mob beating, but they spared the youngest, a 10-year-old, from adult court and a possible 40-year prison term. The 10-year-old was charged with second-degree reckless homicide in Children’s Court, where he now could face a two-year sentence at a juvenile prison, a sentence that could be extended only until he is 18. At least three more teens in custody are expected to be charged next week, and police are looking for more suspects.”

Crime, gangs and broken homes play large part in boys’ lives (10/03/02)
In The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel by Gina Barton
“The 10-year-old who told police he helped beat Charlie Young Jr. to death has been smoking marijuana since summer, his half sister says. A 14-year-old being held in the case already is the father of a baby girl. He was arrested on a burglary charge when he was 8 or 9.”

Wichita to revisit brutal slayings as testimony begins (10/07/02)
In The Washington Times by Valerie Richardson
“The brothers, 24-year-old Reginald and 22-year-old Jonathan, face 113 criminal counts, notably kidnapping, rape, robbery and five murders, in connection with a crime spree from Dec. 7 to Dec. 15, 2000, that terrorized Wichita and much of Kansas. If convicted, they could receive the death penalty.... The Carr brothers are black, and each of the five victims was white. At the time of their arrest, Sedgwick County District Attorney Nola Foulston refused to charge them with hate crimes, explaining that the main motive was robbery, and that Kansas did not have a hate-crimes law.”

Inside Al Qaeda’s Training Camps: What they’re ready for. (10/01/02)
By Bryan Preston at The National Review Online
“Al Qaeda, the notorious terrorist gang responsible for killing 3,025 innocents a year ago, is still alive and planning future atrocities. Though last fall’s military campaign robbed the group of its terrorist training bases in Afghanistan, and possibly of its leader, Osama bin Laden, there is every reason to believe that al Qaeda is still trying to train its troops in weapons use, tactics, and hostage-taking at bases we’ve yet to find and destroy. And as recent developments in upstate New York make clear, al Qaeda probably already has scores of sleeper troops inside the U.S. and around Europe — troops already trained, and awaiting their signal.”

The Bigotry of Jihad (10/02/02)
By John Perazzo at FrontPage Magazine
“Liberals in academia and the media largely refuse to acknowledge the prejudice that animates anti-Israeli and anti-American sentiment in much of the Arab world today. Rather than identify it as raw, unadulterated bigotry, they posit all sorts of rational ‘explanations’ for Muslim antipathy toward other groups.... Rarely is it suggested that Islamic extremists might just be plain, old-fashioned bigots — not unlike the white American bigots who killed James Byrd four years ago.”

Innocents Abroad (10/01/02)
By George Will in The Washington Post
“Not since Jane Fonda posed for photographers at a Hanoi antiaircraft gun has there been anything like Rep. Jim McDermott, speaking to ABC’s ‘This Week’ from Baghdad, saying Americans should take Saddam Hussein at his word but should not take President Bush at his. McDermott, in his seventh term representing Seattle, said Iraqi officials promised him and his traveling companion, Rep. David E. Bonior, a 13-term Michigan Democrat, that weapons inspectors would be ‘allowed to look anywhere.’”

McDermott accuses Bush of plotting to be emperor (10/07/02)
In The Seattle Times by David Postman
“U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott broadened his attack on George W. Bush’s war plans yesterday, saying the president is threatening military action in Iraq as part of a plot to crown himself emperor of America. Criticized for saying on a trip to Iraq early last week that Bush would mislead the American public, McDermott, a Seattle Democrat, was back in his district yesterday telling cheering supporters that Bush is planning a war to distract voters’ attention from domestic problems.”

Crude (10/07/02)
By Peter Beinard at The New Republic
“Whatever you think of the Bushies, September 11, 2001, changed their view of the world. And it is that changed view that has brought America to the brink of war. The left can call that new outlook reckless or arrogant or dumb. But they should at least admit that it’s sincere.”

Message Full of Hypocrisy: Labour forgot Clinton’s notorious foreign policy (10/07/02)
By Christopher Hitchens in The Mirror
“Imagine if, during the Clinton presidency, ex-presidents Reagan or Bush had addressed the Tory Party conference, cast doubt upon the legitimacy of Clinton’s election, trashed his domestic and foreign policy and offered him lukewarm support at a time of crisis. It never happened, because there is a tradition it should not, but in breaking with ex-presidential etiquette Clinton, who’ll do anything for an audience, met an audience that would apparently do anything for him.”

Put up or shut up (10/05/02)
By Mark Steyn in The Spectator
“Structurally, the UN is a creature of the Cold War. It formalised the stalemate of East and West: it was designed to prevent rather than enable action; it tended towards inertia, which was no bad thing given the potentially catastrophic consequences of the alternative. But we no longer have a bipolar world, and so the vetoes only work one way — to restrain the sole surviving superpower. England’s clergy have redefined the Christian concept of a just war to mean only one blessed by the Security Council, which is to say the governments of France, Russia and China: it will be left to two atheists and a lapsed Catholic to determine whether this is a war Christians can support.”

Homosexuality debate could split Anglican Church (08/17/02)
In The Telegraph by Jonathan Petre
“Homosexuality will prove ‘more powerful than God’ if it causes further divisions in the Anglican Church, its most senior leaders have said. In the frankest admission yet that the controversy could tear the worldwide Church apart, the group of 12 primates and bishops said it was dominating their agenda. The group, whose members include the new Archbishop of Canterbury, was set up by the present Archbishop, Dr George Carey, to bridge differences between liberals and traditionalists following the 1998 Lambeth Conference. After a series of meetings over three years, however, it conceded that profound disagreements still remained and it acknowledged that the issue could split the Church still further.”

Carey warns of Church split on gays (09/17/02)
In The Telegraph by Jonathan Petre
“In a stinging rebuke to liberal bishops who are flouting the agreed position of the Church, Dr Carey said that individuals were undermining the whole institution by acting on their own. A number of dioceses in the Unites States and Canada are planning to bless homosexual ‘marriages’ and in another, a traditionalist priest has been deposed by his liberal bishop. Dr Carey said that he had previously condemned the ‘schism’ created by traditionalists and evangelicals who have broken away in protest at the actions of a number of liberal bishops, particularly over homosexuality. These liberal bishops had, however, ignored calls to desist from such actions, which were contrary to the views of the overwhelming majority and which were prompting ‘conscientious’ clergy to leave.”

Denounce gays or quit, church body tells Williams (09/26/02)
In The Telegraph by Jonathan Petre
“Prominent evangelicals in the Church of England raised the stakes over homosexuality yesterday by challenging the new Archbishop of Canterbury to renounce his liberal views or resign. Reform, the conservative evangelical network whose 1,500 members include more than 500 clergy and a bishop, said that it could not welcome the appointment of Dr Rowan Williams to Canterbury because of his ‘non-biblical’ views. In an unprecedented move, the group said that unless Dr Williams was prepared publicly to affirm the Church’s traditional teaching that all sex outside heterosexual marriage was sinful he should withdraw from the post ‘for the sake of the Church’s gospel witness and unity’.”

Rift within Church over gays deepens (10/03/02)
In The Telegraph by Jonathan Petre
“The rift in the Church of England over homosexuality deepened last night when two mainstream evangelical groups joined the growing chorus of criticism of the new Archbishop of Canterbury’s liberal stance on the issue. In a sign that battle lines are being drawn up, the two groups, which represent several thousand clergy and which are based in every diocese, said that concern over Dr Rowan Williams existed far more widely than among the relatively small ‘conservative’ evangelical wing of the Church. The Church of England Evangelical Council and the Anglican Evangelical Assembly backed the move by the conservative evangelical network Reform to urge Dr Williams to renounce his liberal views or resign, as reported in The Telegraph last week.”

Motive for Massacre: It’s not about “the West.” It’s about religious beliefs. (09/27/02)
By Paul Marshall at OpinionJournal
“The key in each case is not a geopolitical affiliation but an unacceptable religious belief. When al Qaeda was formed in 1998, it was named the ‘World Islamic Front for Holy War Against Jews and Crusaders.’ Osama bin Laden stressed in an Al-Jazeera interview at the time that his target was ‘World Christianity, which is allied with Jews and Zionism.’”

Globalthink’s Perils (09/24/02)
By Daniel Pipes in The New York Post
“In the debate over Iraq, the Democrats and most allied governments are demanding United Nations Security Council endorsement of a military campaign — or they are against it. This is a strange position. The U.S. government, with an over two-century record of forwarding human rights and defeating tyrants, is to defer to the United Nations? The duly elected leaders of the United States should step aside and let assorted dictators make key decisions affecting American national security?”

Nothing to lose but their chains (09/28/02)
By David Pryce-Jones in The Spectator
“Iraq may soon be liberated. The Americans are building bases and runways in the Middle East, airlifting men and supplies, and passing the resolutions in Congress necessary to take military action. Regime change is what President Bush has set his heart on. Condoleezza Rice goes further: she calls for democracy, not only in Iraq but also in the wider Muslim world. From the reaction all over Europe, you might think that Washington was insisting on the sacrifice of the first-born.”

We Must Fight Iraq (09/26/02)
By Christopher Hitchens in The Mirror
“It is almost certainly a mistake to assume anybody’s position on Iraq is determined by evidence alone. After all, last year there was overwhelming evidence of the connection between the World Trade Center aggression, al-Qaeda and the Taliban — and a decisive UN mandate for action — but many on the left opposed military action in Afghanistan, and still do. I have the feeling that Tony Blair would feel happier making the moral case that Saddam must go.”

Consider This: Clinton’s chief Iraq expert announces his reluctant belief that an invasion is needed. (09/26/02)
By Stanley Kurtz at National Review Online
“Setting aside, for the moment, the question of which political party is responsible for past missteps, Pollack’s more politically significant point may be his concluding claim that ‘the members of the international community who bleat about the importance of collective security, multilateral diplomacy, and international law have gravely weakened all three (not to mention the U.N. Security Council) by allowing Iraq to flout them while chastising the United States (and our handful of allies) when we objected....’ In other words, Pollack argues that the same nations now screaming about our invasion plans are the very ones who undermined the legal and multilateral policy of containment against Iraq.”

Iraq and the War on Terrorism (09/23/02)
Speech by Al Gore at San Francisco’s Commonwealth Club in USA Today
“I’m speaking today in an effort to recommend a specific course of action for our country which I believe would be preferable to the course recommended by President Bush. Specifically, I am deeply concerned that the policy we are presently following with respect to Iraq has the potential to seriously damage our ability to win the war against terrorism and to weaken our ability to lead the world in this new century.”

For Remarks on Iraq, Gore Gets Praise and Scorn (09/25/02)
By Adam Nagourney in The New York Times
“Mr. Gore's advisers described his speech as a genuine expression of sentiment about an issue with which he has long been closely identified, rather than an attempt to position himself for the 2004 presidential election. He wrote it after consulting a fairly far-flung group of advisers that included Rob Reiner, the actor and filmmaker. For all that, some Democrats expressed skepticism that Mr. Gore had enhanced his standing.”

Speechless (09/26/02)
By Editors of The New Republic
“The former vice president’s speech almost perfectly encapsulated the evasions that have characterized the Democratic Party’s response to President Bush’s proposed war in Iraq. In typical Democratic style, Gore didn’t say he opposed the war. In fact, he endorsed the goal of regime change — before presenting a series of qualifications that would likely make that goal impossible.”

The new San Francisco democrat (09/27/02)
By Jonah Goldberg at TownHall
“Gore doubles back, crisscrosses and zigzags — between favoring force, opposing force, opposing multilateralism, opposing unilateralism — the only conclusion one can reach is that this speech wasn’t written to reveal his convictions. It was crafted as an attack on Bush and an attempt to win the Democratic nomination. The overriding theme wasn’t to depoliticize the war but to blame George Bush, at all costs.”

Look Who’s Playing Politics (09/25/02)
By Michael Kelly in The Washington Post
“Gore’s speech was one no decent politician could have delivered. It was dishonest, cheap, low. It was hollow. It was bereft of policy, of solutions, of constructive ideas, very nearly of facts — bereft of anything other than taunts and jibes and embarrassingly obvious lies. It was breathtakingly hypocritical, a naked political assault delivered in tones of moral condescension from a man pretending to be superior to mere politics. It was wretched. It was vile. It was contemptible. But I understate.”

Conservative Churches Grew Fastest in 1990’s, Report Says (09/18/02)
In The New York Times by Laurie Goodstein
“Socially conservative churches that demand high commitment from their members grew faster than other religious denominations in the last decade, according to a study released yesterday by statisticians who count American religious affiliations every 10 years.... ‘I was astounded to see that by and large the growing churches are those that we ordinarily call conservative,’ said Ken Sanchagrin, director of the Glenmary Research Center and a professor and chairman of the department of sociology at Mars Hill College in Mars Hill, N.C. ‘And when I looked at those that were declining, most were moderate or liberal churches. And the more liberal the denomination, by most people’s definition, the more they were losing.’”

Christianity’s New Center (09/12/02)
Interview of Philip Jenkins by Katie Bacon at Atlantic Unbound
“In the global South you have almost a pre-Vatican II, old-world kind of Catholicism. Catholics there are more concerned with the traditional, more willing to accept authority and leadership, more prepared to insist on orthodoxy. Whereas in America and Europe we tend to have cafeteria Catholicism, as in, I'll take a little bit of this, a little bit of that, throw in a bit of Wicca, and see what we come up with.”

Prior Knowledge of Sept. 11 Not Just Urban Legend (09/10/02)
At Insight on the News by Jeffrey Scott Shapiro
“‘What are you looking at?’ asked the schoolteacher as she approached one of her freshman students. The boy, a young Palestinian, seemed captivated as he stared out the window across Brooklyn toward the lower downtown area of Manhattan. ‘Do you see those two buildings?’ he asked while pointing toward the World Trade Center. ‘They won’t be standing there next week.’ It was noon, Sept. 6, 2001.”

Hippocratic Oafs: Muslims demand sensitivity. They ought to show some too. (09/20/02)
By Peggy Noonan at OpinionJournal
“So the Southerners are eyeballing the young Muslim males. Maybe these guys are bad guys. They allow themselves to think this in part because one of the things Americans regret most since Sept. 11 2001 is their lack of suspicion. We’re all very live-and-let-live. Before Sept. 11, young Muslim males could tell someone in passing that soon those towers in New York will go boom. And fearing to offend, fearing to hurt the feelings of another person, we’d let it pass. We’d mind our business, give them the benefit of the doubt.”

Iraqi Interrogatories: The usual questions about Iraq. (09/20/02)
By Victor Davis Hanson at The National Review Online
“Since September 11 there has no longer been a margin of safety — or error — allowing us a measure of absolute certainty before action. Long gone is the notion that American soil is inviolable or that enemies will not butcher thousands of civilians unexpectedly and in time of peace. All we need to know is that [Saddam Hussein] broke the armistice agreements of the first war, violated the weapons-inspections accords, likes to attack other countries, dallies with terrorists, has nightmarish weapons, and has already fought us once. That he is a dictator, killed thousands of his own people, sought to assassinate a president of the United States, tried to destroy the ecology of Kuwait, and sent missiles into Israel and Saudi Arabia are not misdemeanors.”

Behind the Hate: The enemy’s problem. (09/11/02)
By David Pryce-Jones at The National Review Online
“For centuries now, the West and its social order has challenged other civilizations. In the face of that challenge, China, Japan, India, adopted the science and the arts, even the music, which were both the cause and the effect of Western creativity. Leaders and thinkers in Muslim countries also tried to match the West. With the possible exception of Turkey, they proved unable to do so. The reasons for this are unclear. Nobody and nothing effectively stands in the way of education, reform, experiment in building a modern social order with its own special characteristics like other peoples.”

Is This the Way to Decide on Iraq? (09/20/02)
By Charles Krauthammer in The Washington Post
“When the case for war is made purely in terms of American national interest — in terms of the safety, security and very lives of American citizens — chins are pulled as the Democrats think it over. But when the case is the abstraction of being the good international citizen and strengthening the House of Kofi, the Democrats are ready to parachute into Baghdad.”

U.S. Was Aware of bin Laden Threat Before Sept. 11 Attacks (09/19/02)
In The New York Times by James Risen
“The Congressional panels’ staff director said on Wednesday that the American intelligence community was told in 1998 that Arab terrorists were planning to fly a bomb-laden aircraft into the World Trade Center, but the F.B.I. and the Federal Aviation Administration did not take the threat seriously. The August 1998 intelligence report from the Central Intelligence Agency was just one of several warnings the United States received, but did not seriously analyze, in the years leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks that were detailed at the Congressional hearings.”

Congress was Warned Two Months Before 9/11 Attacks (09/19/02)
At Cybercast News Service by Jeff Johnson
“Based on information gathered by the committee, there were a total of 28 pieces of intelligence information gathered after June 1998 that hinted bin Laden wanted to strike the U.S., including 11 indicating an imminent attack after March 2001. Additionally, 12 so-called ‘intelligence indicators’ lead analysts to believe that al Qaeda would use airplanes to strike targets in Washington, D.C., and New York.”

A Visit to Shanksville (09/11/02)
By Joan Marie Nagy at NewsMax
“I hope the permanent memorial maintains the evidence of that violent impact and preserves that hallowed ground forever. Americans need to remember the price paid in that Pennsylvania field. When I remember September 11, I will feel grief, then anger, then pride. The overwhelming thought or feeling I will forever associate with September 11 will be that, when given a chance, most every ordinary American will still fight to the death to preserve the lives of other Americans.”

A Bell Tolls In Shanksville (09/11/02)
At CBSNews by Jim Krasula (?)
“Flight 93 took off from Newark, N.J., bound for San Francisco. It crashed in a grass field next to a line of trees about 70 miles southeast of Pittsburgh — far from the devastation in New York and at the Pentagon. The reason, say investigators, is that people on board confronted their four hijackers and brought down the flight far from some intended target in Washington, D.C. — The Capitol, according to al Qaeda members interviewed by Arab television recently.”

“Citizen-soldiers” of Flight 93 honored (09/12/02)
In The Modesto Bee by Lawrence M. O’Rourke
“Charles Carpenter, a farmer just over the ridge from the crash site, said the terrorists failed to splinter America. ‘The terrible thing that happened here has brought us closer together as a people,’ he said. ‘If those terrorists had in mind splitting us up, it sure did backfire.’ Sandy Dahl, widow of pilot Jason Dahl, said that the memory of Sept. 11 constantly reminds her that ‘lives are short and there is no time for hate.’ ‘Here we remember ordinary people who did heroic things,’ said Albert Youngblood, an accountant whose half sister, Wanda Green, a flight attendant, died in the crash. Alice Hoglan, the mother of passenger Mark Bingham of San Francisco, said the terrorist attack showed the need for the United States to take an active role in solving the world’s problems. ‘Today was beautiful,’ she said. ‘It was a fitting tribute in honor of the actions the people aboard Flight 93 took.’”

The Heroes Of Flight 93: The last full measure of devotion (09/12/02)
In Newsday by Hugo Kugiya
“A sharp change in the weather marked the service for the 33 passengers (not including the four hijackers) and the crew of seven aboard the Boeing 757 that crashed onto a reclaimed strip mine about an hour after it departed Newark Airport. Low, dark clouds, propelled by a furious wind, arrived with the dawn, turning frigid what had been a string of balmy, humid days. Schools in Somerset County were canceled for the day, as all the district’s school buses were deployed to shuttle people to the memorial site. Attendees were searched and prohibited from freely entering and leaving the service. State police patrolled the grounds on horseback. A covered stage was set up about 500 yards from the crash site, where the Johnstown Symphony Orchestra and a Marine Corps band played to open the service at 9:30 a.m. Relatives sat in white folding chairs on a gravel clearing in front of the stage. Separated by a plastic fence behind the relatives were the 4,000 others who attended.”

Flight 93 Victims Praised as Patriots (09/11/02)
At KDKA by The Associated Press
“Family members clutched flowers and flags - some wore pins with photographs of their lost loved ones - under overcast skies as wind whipped across the pastoral setting. Military aircraft, first large cargo ships and then four fighter jets, flew over the ceremony in formation.... Some of the family members of the victims also spoke. Murial Borza, an 11-year-old who lost her half-sister, Deora Bodley, asked for a minute of silence for world peace. Sandy Dahl, the wife of Flight 93 pilot Jason Dahl said, ‘If we learn nothing else from this tragedy, we learn that life is short and there is no time for hate.’”

Courage of Flight 93 heroes celebrated in Pa. (09/12/02)
In The (Penn State) Collegian by Adam Fabian
“‘We are all grateful,’ Director of Homeland Security and former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge told the listeners. ‘Your loved ones did not expect to serve the cause of freedom that Tuesday morning, but serve freedom they did.’ Ridge also took a moment during his statement to thank the citizens of Shanksville for their help and support. ‘This sleepy little town puts its arms around you and embraces you,’ he said. After those remarks, the family members of Flight 93 stood and applauded the crowd that included many residents of Shanksville and surrounding communities.”

Site of Crash Is “Hallowed Ground”: In a Pa. Field, Thousands Pay Homage to Where America First Fought Back (09/11/02)
In The Washington Post by Sue Anne Pressley
“There is nothing much to see at the rural crash site of United Airlines Flight 93 — just a line of charred trees and a distant disturbance in the oats field where the giant crater was. Yet people keep coming here, with the hushed reverence of church-goers, more than a thousand of them a week. Most say it helps them somehow. They stand quietly near the wall of tokens brought here by other visitors — the police patches and firefighters’ caps from around the country, the flags with broken hearts designed by someone in Ohio, even plain rocks with ‘Thank you, Heroes of Flight 93’ scrawled over them in big black letters.”

Flight 93 Passengers Honored with Gratitude (09/11/02)
At ABCNews by David Morgan of Reuters
“The tolling of a single bell and release of white doves on a wind-swept field on Wednesday honored the memory of the 40 passengers and crew on United Airlines Flight 93, a year after their plane crashed during an onboard struggle with four hijackers. Near the edge of a reclaimed strip mine in the Appalachian highlands 70 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, thousands — including more than 500 relatives of the victims — gathered for an anniversary service under leaden skies, many tearfully clutching American flags.”

Site Of Tragedy Now A Shrine To American Heroes (09/02/02)
At Cox Newspapers by Bob Dart
“Todd Beamer’s final call to action is repeated on hundreds of signs, rocks and scrawled messages at the temporary memorial that overlooks the crash site. Congress will soon approve legislation authorizing the National Park Service to build and maintain a permanent memorial. It will be designed with input of the families of the 40 victims of Flight 93. Meanwhile, thousands of tributes have been attached to a billboard-sized rectangle of chain-link fence. Smaller memorials are added daily by the visitors who drive down Skyline Drive to reach the site. Visitors write on every available spot — poster boards attached to the fence, the guard rails around the parking lot, stones on the ground, even the porta-potties. ”

Life in small town forever changed by Sept. 11 plane crash (03/09/02)
In The (South Carolina) State by Amy Worden of Knight Ridder Newspapers
“Twenty miles from the Pennsylvania Turnpike, along narrow roads, Shanksville is not easy to find. A driver could easily miss the small sign directing traffic to a temporary memorial along a newly paved mountaintop road. Visitors stop at a parking area built a quarter-mile from the crash site, overlooking the area now ringed with chain-link fence and still under 24-hour guard. A memorial wall - a colorful shrine to the heroes of Flight 93 - has sprouted on the barren land scarred by years of mining. Visitors leave familiar tokens behind - flags, flowers, toys and signs - and they bring intimate mementos such as MIA bracelets, watches, police badges, and a United Airlines flight attendant’s uniform.”

Year One: We Didn’t Change After All (09/09/02)
By Charles Krauthammer in The Spectator
“This September 11 marks not just a day of infamy, but the close of Year One of that war. And to win it we will need to demonstrate — as we did in the other great wars of necessity — patience, endurance, determination, and a willingness to bear any burden. That is a solemn calling, but it need not elicit grim solemnity. Success will require that both sides of the American character — the visible fluff and the (once) buried steel — remain in play. Last September 11, we thought that the one must banish the other. The great lesson, the great triumph, of Year One is that fury and grit did not drive out lightness and laughter. And a good thing too. To prevail in this long twilight struggle, we will need them all.”

The triumph of American values (09/07/02)
By Mark Steyn in The Spectator
“The change that occurred on 11 September was a simple one. When Osama bin Laden blew up the World Trade Center, he also blew up the polite fictions of the pre-war world. At Ground Zero, they’ve been working frantically to clear away the rubble. Likewise, at the UN, EU and all the rest, they’ve also been working frantically not so much to clear away the mess but to stick it back together and reconstruct the great fantasy world as it existed on 10 September, that bizarro make-believe land where Nato is a ‘mutual defence alliance’ and Egypt and Saudi Arabia are ‘our staunch friends’. Even in America, some people are still living in that world. You can switch on the TV and hear apparently sane ‘experts’ using phrases like ‘Bush risks losing the support of the Arab League’.”

America, Be Angry: This is no time to “get over” Sept. 11. (08/13/02)
By Rod Dreher at The National Review Online
“The most patriotic thing the networks can do in the days running up to the September 11 anniversary is run those pictures of the planes crashing into the towers, over and over. They were taken off the air days after the attack, for fear of traumatizing the shocked nation. Well, we need to be shocked again. We need to be traumatized again. Our national survival depends on it. And this time, don't withhold the images of human beings jumping to their deaths from the upper floors of the towers. We can handle the truth.”

It’s a good time for war (09/08/02)
By Christopher Hitchens in The Boston Globe
“I am not particularly a war lover, and on the occasions when I have seen warfare as a traveling writer, I have tended to shudder. But here was a direct, unmistakable confrontation between everything I loved and everything I hated. On one side, the ethics of the multicultural, the secular, the skeptical, and the cosmopolitan. (Those are the ones I love, by the way.) On the other, the arid monochrome of dull and vicious theocratic fascism. I am prepared for this war to go on for a very long time. I will never become tired of waging it, because it is a fight over essentials.”

Say no to the nay-sayers (08/31/02)
By Bruce Anderson in The Spectator
“Before the summer recess, all of Mr Blair’s senior advisers were convinced that America would go to war with the UK in support, and nothing seems to have changed during the PM’s holiday. There is a constant interplay of co-operation between London and Washington; the SIS and the CIA are virtually functioning as one body. Recently, one British visitor was chatting to CIA Director George Tenet about the Europeans’ role. ‘I’ll tell you exactly what the President said the other day on that very subject,’ said Mr Tenet. ‘He said, “I don’t give a sh*t what the Europeans think.”’”

Are We Owed an Apology? Muslim leaders remain mute on 9/11. (08/16/02)
By William F. Buckley Jr. at The National Review Online
“If a band of Americans, proclaiming their devotion to the faith, assaulted a Muslim center, we would not need to wait very long for disavowals — by Christian leaders. When John Brown carried his faith to unreasonable lengths, we hanged him. What we are waiting for, says Dr. Graham, is an apology from Muslim leaders. Why shouldn’t we have that? An explicit disavowal, as contrary to acceptable teachings of the Koran — of the acts of the terrorists.”

The Parable of the Weed: Attacking terrorism at its roots. (07/19/02)
By Victor Davis Hanson at The National Review Online
“The latter systematic choice in the short-term — the ending of Saddam Hussein; ultimatums to Syria and Iran to cease their succor to Hezbollah, Hamas, and Islamic Jihad, or else; a reckoning with the terrorist enclaves in Lebanon; a gradual dissolution of alliances with the autocracies of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan; subsidies to democratic reformers throughout the Middle East — is both unorthodox, frightening, and easily caricatured. But, in the long term, it offers the only hope of destroying weeds like al Qaeda for good. Anything less and we are simply pruning back a perennial pest.”

US begins push for humanitarian aid in Iraq (08/14/02)
In The Financial Times by Carola Hoyos in Washington
“The US has launched a public bidding process for humanitarian relief organisations to work in Iraq and surrounding areas in the run-up to a possible military campaign against the regime of Iraqi president Saddam Hussein. In addition, Central Command, the military operations centre co-ordinating the war against terrorism, this week asked for a list of American international relief organisations - non-governmental organisations - working in or around Iraq, senior members of NGOs said.”

Preemptive strike on Iraq to improve peace prospects (08/11/02)
By Henry Kissinger in The Manila Times
“Military intervention should be attempted only if we are willing to sustain such an effort for however long it is needed. For, in the end, the task is to translate intervention in Iraq into terms of general applicability for an international system. The imminence of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the huge dangers it involves, the rejection of a viable inspection system, the demons­trated hostility of Saddam combine to produce an imperative for preemptive action. But it is not in the American national interest to establish preemption as a universal principle available to every nation.”

Act Now: The danger is immediate. Saddam Hussein must be removed. (09/06/02)
By George P. Schulz in The Washington Post
“This is a defining moment in international affairs. Authorization for action is clear. We have made endless efforts to bring Saddam Hussein into line with the duly considered judgments of a unanimous U.N. Security Council. Let us go to the Security Council and assert this case with the care of a country determined to take decisive action. And this powerful case for acting now must be made promptly to Congress. Its members will have to stand up and be counted. Then let’s get on with the job.”

Target Iraq’s Terrorist Regime, Not Just Osama bin Laden, to Win War on Terrorism (10/02/01)
By James A. Phillips of The Heritage Foundation
“President George W. Bush has declared war against international terrorism in response to the September 11 terrorist attacks that killed more than 6,000 innocent people. That war will require eradicating Osama bin Laden’s global terrorist network and uprooting its Taliban protectors from Afghanistan. But that alone will not be enough to stop terrorism. Troubling questions have been raised about possible Iraqi support for bin Laden’s network; this is not surprising, given Iraq’s past support for terrorist attacks against America and its allies.”

Bushophobia on West 43rd Street: The New York Times’s daily rant. (08/12/02)
By Erin Sheley in The Weekly Standard
“On two consecutive days last week, the New York Times advanced its crusade against military action in Iraq with page-one ‘news’ stories — the first detailing a leaked war plan, the second predicting dire effects for the U.S. economy. While these prominently featured pieces occasioned much comment, lesser instances of the Times’s political use of its news columns are commonplace and also deserve attention.”

The Left has lost its way and lost its voice (08/17/02)
By Camille Paglia in The London Times
“Only a lunatic fringe on the far Left is still calling for revolution, a smashing of the social order, but it must be acknowledged how widespread that idea was in the 1960s. Most leftists do believe that, without them, the naive proletariat would wallow for ever in ignorance and slavery. Unless they are volunteering hands-on service in blighted neighbourhoods, however, most leftists are far removed from working-class life. Many are wordsmiths — journalists or academics who run in packs. Leftism has become wordplay — a refuge for bourgeois intellectuals guilty about their comfort and privilege.”

Teaching Enronomics (07/02/02)
By Stephen Balch in The New York Post
“In the wake of the recent scandals, the National Association of Scholars, an association of academics dedicated to raising standards on campus, asked Zogby International to poll American college seniors about what they’re being taught. College students imbibe from their academic mentors a low opinion of prevailing business ethics. When asked to name a profession in which, according to their teachers, an ‘anything goes’ attitude is most likely to yield success, business leads the pack - chosen by 28 percent - among eight choices provided. (Twenty percent named journalism; 16 percent, law. Teaching, science/medicine, the civil service, religion and the military each drew 5 percent or less.)”

NAS/Zogby Poll Reveals American Colleges Are Teaching Dubious Ethical Lessons (07/02/02)
A Press Release from National Association of Scholars
“‘These results have disturbing implications both for America’s economy and its institutions of higher education,’ said National Association of Scholars President Stephen H. Balch. ‘They suggest that our colleges and universities, however unwittingly, are contributing to, and perpetuating, the ethical laxness behind the recent scandals at Enron, Worldcom, and other major American firms.’ ‘To be sure, the foundations of ethical education are laid in the home and school. At best, universities can only confirm the lessons taught there. But they can also undermine these lessons by providing sophisticated excuses for succumbing to the temptations of greed and power. The relativization and politicization of ethical standards, plus cynicism about business in general, opens the way for such excuse making.’”

College Seniors Taught Right and Wrong Is Relative (07/08/02)
At Cybercast News Service by Lawrence Morahan
“A large majority of students also report that they’ve been taught that corporate policies furthering ‘progressive’ social and political goals are more important than those ensuring that stockholders and creditors receive accurate accounts of a firm’s finances, the study said. When respondents were given a list of business practices and asked, based on what they’ve been taught at college, which of the practices rank as the most important, 38 percent chose ‘recruiting a diverse workforce in which women and minorities are advanced and promoted.’ Eighteen percent chose ‘minimizing environmental pollution,’ and another 18 percent chose ‘avoiding layoffs by not exporting jobs or moving plants from one area to another.’ Only 23 percent said ‘providing clear and accurate business statements to stockholders and creditors’ is the most important business practice.”

Professors who see no evil (07/22/02)
By John Leo in U.S. News & World Report
“A Zogby International poll of college seniors came up with a fascinating finding. Almost all of the 401 randomly selected students around the country–97 percent–said their college studies had prepared them to behave ethically in their future work lives. So far, so good. But 73 percent of the students said that when their professors taught about ethical issues, the usual message was that uniform standards of right and wrong don’t exist (‘what is right and wrong depends on differences in individual values and cultural diversity’). It’s not news that today’s campuses are drenched in moral relativism. But we are allowed to be surprised that college students report they are being well prepared ethically by teachers who tell them, in effect, that there are no real ethical standards, so anything goes.”

Point. Click. Think? As Students Rely on the Internet for Research, Teachers Try to Warn of the Web’s Snares (07/16/02)
In The Washington Post by Laura Sessions Stepp
“Welcome to the world of Net thinking, a form of reasoning that characterizes many students who are growing up with the Internet as their primary, and in some cases, sole source of research. Ask teachers and they’ll tell you: Among all the influences that shape young thinking skills, computer technology is the biggest one. ‘Students’ first recourse for any kind of information is the Web. It’s absolutely automatic,’ says Kenneth Kotovsky, a psychology professor at Carnegie-Mellon University who has examined the study habits of young people.”

Assignment America: Tales from the newsroom (07/08/02)
By John Bloom at United Press International
“This new book Coloring the News: How Crusading for Diversity Has Corrupted American Journalism... will break your heart. I’ve worked in journalism all my life, and I had no idea any of this was going on. All through the 1990s, every time Rush Limbaugh would accuse the media of a liberal bias, I would just chuckle it away as the usual sort of right-wing paranoia we’ve been dealing with since the Nixon administration. But William McGowan has written a carefully researched analysis of news coverage in the ’90s, showing that ... it’s true. It’s even worse than liberal bias.”

Break cycle of eternal poverty (07/16/02)
By Jim Wooten in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
“America’s first public housing projects for the poor were in Atlanta. The idea born here should die here. The nation should never build another stick of public housing. Assembling the poor in concentrations where their life models are broken families and welfare dependency is an idea whose time is gone. It’s a mistake to teach self-destructive behavior — and that is the legacy of public housing.”

Cohabiting can make marriage an iffy proposition; Even married, men may still feel less committed (07/08/02)
In USA Today by Karen S. Peterson
“An expert addressing a ‘Smart Marriages’ conference this week will drop research on his colleagues that may indeed make some Americans smart. Researcher Scott Stanley’s case is this: Women living unmarried with guys and expecting a lasting, committed marriage down the line had better review their options. His research finds that men who cohabit with the women they eventually marry are less committed to the union than men who never lived with their spouses ahead of time.”

Perfidious Belgium (07/13/02)
By Paul Belien in The Spectator
“According to a recent inquiry ordered by a Belgian parliamentary commission, Brussels has become a major recruiting base for al-Qa’eda and a launch-pad for terrorist attacks on neighbouring countries. The commission investigated the failure of the Sûreté de l’Etat, the Belgian secret service, to screen Islamic terrorists. On 5 June, Mrs Godelieve Timmermans, the head of the Sûreté, resigned after the report concluded that the Sûreté had remained passive because it had found no indications that the terrorists would attack Belgian targets, and also because the Sûreté did not want to discredit certain corrupt Belgian authorities or politicians for fear that these might attribute to the secret service ‘a racist or xenophobic attitude towards immigrants or Muslims’.”

Gays race supporters of marriage amendment (07/15/02)
In The Washington Times by Larry Witham
“To neutralize state court rulings on same-sex ‘marriage’ rights, Mr. Daniels and other family-values groups are backing the Federal Marriage Amendment, which last month was introduced in the House with bipartisan backing. It would amend the U.S. Constitution to define marriage as between a man and woman and allow state legislatures to decide on marriage benefits.”

The Gay Inquisition (07/19/02)
By Camille Paglia at FrontPage Magazine
“There was a time when gay men were known for their scathingly independent minds and their encyclopedic knowledge of culture. The welcome relaxation of legal and social sanctions against homosexuality over the past 30 years has paradoxically weakened the unsentimental powers of observation for which gays, as outsiders, were once renowned. Gay men used to be ferocious exemplars of free thought and free speech. But within 15 years of the 1969 Stonewall rebellion, an insidious totalitarianism infected gay activism, parallel to what was occurring in feminism in the Catharine MacKinnon/Andrea Dworkin era. Intolerance and witch hunts became the norm.”

Moral Relativity Is a Hot Topic? True. Absolutely. (07/13/02)
By Edward Rothstein in The New York Times
“The war now taking shape may even be related to the principles that gave birth to postmodernism. Avatars of absolutism — terrorist Islamic fundamentalists — are challenging the liberal democratic societies of the West, objecting to their power, their values, their differing creeds, their modern (and postmodern) perspectives. This is something Mr. Fish recognizes. But postmodernism tends to retain its old critical habits. So when postmodernist arguments are applied to the war, they often seem directed at the West, relativizing its claims and qualifying condemnations of the opposition.”

America should celebrate its independence (07/04/02)
By Mark Steyn in The National Post
“The anything most of the Western world’s non-believers believe in is government: the age of church-and-state has been superseded by the era of state-as-church. In Europe, they’re happy to have cast off the supposed stultifying oppressiveness of religion for a world in which the EU regulates every aspect of life from ‘xenophobia’ to the curvature of bananas. The fact that the most religious nation in the West is also the most powerful militarily, economically and culturally may be sheerest coincidence, so let’s just say that separating church from state wound up strengthening the vitality of religion in America.”

Why we should all love America (07/04/02)
By Michael Gove in The London Times
“Britain may be more stable, earthed and charming. Australia may have much of America’s openness with a healthier population, freer of conceit. Europe’s smaller nations such as The Netherlands and Denmark may have succeeded in building greater social solidarity while still preserving personal freedom. But no nation has the sheer innovative energy, the democratic vitality, the openness to personal growth and the willingness to shoulder burdens bigger than itself that America has.”

The business of America is America — and we’d better get used to it (07/06/02)
By Matthew Paris in The Spectator
“Why should the Americans join the ICC if they do not want to? Are they not a sovereign nation with some reason to distrust progressive internationalists? America is not preventing other countries setting up whatever international courts we choose; she is simply declining to take part. Any claims we make to jurisdiction over non-participants are preposterous, and if we cannot assure Washington that US peacekeeping troops are safe from being dragged before this court, then — obviously again — her troops will come home.”

Fatah calls for attacks on US, Zionist targets (07/02/02)
By Margot Dudkevitch and Lamia Lahoud in The Jerusalem Post
“Groups affiliated with Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat’s Fatah movement yesterday called upon all Palestinian organizations, including the Islamic movements, to attack Zionist and American targets everywhere in response to US efforts ‘to remove the legitimate leadership of the Palestinian people.’”

Time for Muslim Show-and-Tell (07/02/02)
By Tammy Bruce at FrontPage Magazine
“Somehow the pathetic proving would rest with the victims as we swim in false guilt and political correctness inflicted on us by the Left Elite for decades. The same mentality that compelled the American establishment to beg Muslims to like us in the aftermath of slaughter brought to us by their ‘brothers’ is also responsible for our inability to stop it as the conspiracy grew. Can you imagine an effort by law enforcement before September 11 to question Arabs or Muslims in this country? It was impossible. And it remains impossible even after the attack. Our hands were tied then as they are now, by a Left Elite rhetoric that has reduced our critical minds to mush, and twisted our legal right to defend ourselves into the bizarre effort at group therapy to make sure those who hate us know that we don’t hate them.”

The Enemy Among Us (07/02/02)
By Editors of The New York Post
“Ten months after 9/11, too many officials remain reluctant to address head-on the question of how much support for terrorism exists within the U.S. Muslim community. Efforts at the worthy goal of reassuring Muslim-Americans that their community isn’t being stigmatized have left many government officials suddenly sharing a platform with known supporters of Islamic terrorism.”

Test of revered wisdom (07/07/02)
By Linda Chavez in The Washington Times
“The Founders understood that religious belief was not incidental to the American experiment in liberty but was the foundation on which it was built. The whole idea that individuals were entitled to liberty rests on the Judeo-Christian conception of man. When the colonists rebelled against their king — an action that risked their very lives — they did so with the belief that they were answering to a higher law than the king’s. They were emboldened by ‘the laws of nature and nature’s God,’ in Thomas Jefferson’s memorable phrase, to declare their independence.”

Death of a Thousand Cuts: Killing the death penalty softly. (07/02/02)
By William Saletan at Slate
“The Times isn’t really angry that the death penalty is administered too secretly in Japan or too openly in the United States. It’s angry that the death penalty is administered at all. But most Americans don’t share that view, so the Times and other critics seize on any related issue — the killer’s youth or mental capacity, the execution’s secrecy or publicity — that might buy extra sympathy for the condemned. Over time, these related issues add up. If you can’t kill murderers when they’re too young or too old, too dumb or too smart, killed secretly or killed openly, then you can’t kill them at all. That’s the objective all these arguments are meant to disguise.”

The Political Intolerance of Academic Feminism (06/21/02)
By Mary Zeiss Stange in The Chronicle Review
“Feminist scholars have struggled to be inclusive when it comes to every conceivable form of "otherness" (race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, class, age, appearance, education, ability). Every form of otherness, that is, except one: politics. How ironic, given that our movement began with the assertion that the personal is political.”

Letting Parents Decide (06/28/02)
By Editors of The Washington Post
“In affirming yesterday the constitutionality of Ohio’s use of vouchers in Cleveland — one of the country’s most dramatically failed school systems — the Supreme Court’s conservative majority rightly created wiggle room for states, localities and potentially even Congress to try carefully designed voucher programs. The case split the court along ideological lines, with the court’s more liberal justices all but declaring this voucher program to signify the end of church-state separation. We don’t belittle the dangers. But the dangers of vouchers are hypothetical ones at this stage. The crisis in education is real. And the court should not be insisting that the only lawful policies are the ones that have already failed.”

A Win for America’s Children (06/28/02)
By Rod Paige in The Washington Post
“The No Child Left Behind Act, when fully implemented, will make it easier to determine what works and what doesn’t in America’s schools, and it will carry consequences for failure. Among the consequences are public school choice and access to supplemental educational services, both underwritten by federal dollars. Now the Supreme Court has opened the door to even broader school choices, not only ushering in a new era in American education policy but also potentially starting a reformation in American public education. What must emerge through this education reformation should be a focus on students and achievement, rather than on the ‘system.’”

Federal Appeals Court Rules Pledge of Allegiance Unconstitutional (06/26/02)
In The Washington Post by David Kravets of Associated Press
“Harvard scholar Laurence Tribe predicted the U.S. Supreme Court will certainly reverse the decision unless the 9th Circuit reverses itself. ‘I would bet an awful lot on that,’ Tribe said. The 9th Circuit is the nation’s most overturned appellate court – partly because